7.1 Operating model and flows
CLM-1 (synchronous co-origination) — end-to-end flow
Section titled “CLM-1 (synchronous co-origination) — end-to-end flow”1. Borrower applies (via NBFC's channel / partner / embedded / DSA). ↓2. NBFC runs full underwriting flow. ↓3. Decision engine runs BOTH NBFC's policy AND partner's policy. ↓4. Outcomes possible: a) Both approve → CO-LEND b) Only NBFC approves → OWN BOOK (if NBFC product allows standalone) c) Only partner approves → declined for co-lending; flag for own-book if eligible d) Both decline → DECLINE ↓5. For CO-LEND path: a) Compute split (e.g., 80:20 partner:NBFC). b) Generate KFS showing both lenders. c) Borrower e-signs agreement + KFS + NACH. ↓6. Booking handoff: a) NBFC books its share on its books. b) NBFC sends booking instruction to partner via API / SFTP. c) Partner books its share. d) Both lenders confirm via ack. ↓7. Disbursement: a) Partner releases its share to ESCROW. b) NBFC releases its share to ESCROW. c) Combined amount disbursed to borrower from ESCROW with single UTR. ↓8. LMS: a) NBFC creates the loan account in its LMS. b) NBFC mirrors to partner via daily MIS. c) Borrower sees a single loan + EMI. ↓9. Repayments: a) Borrower repays via NACH / UPI AutoPay / direct. b) Funds land in collection ESCROW. c) Waterfall splits per ratio. d) Daily settlement: NBFC's share to NBFC, partner's share to partner. ↓10. NPA lockstep: a) Borrower DPD breaches 90 → NPA. b) Both lenders classify same day (lockstep). c) NPA reflected in monthly bureau submission by both. ↓11. Collections (single-point): a) NBFC owns collection. b) Partner sees status via MIS; doesn't independently call. ↓12. Recovery split per ratio. ↓13. Closure: NOC, mandate cancellation, partner notified.Key data hand-offs
Section titled “Key data hand-offs”| Step | Format | Frequency | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Loan booking instruction | API (preferred) or SFTP file | Real-time / hourly | NBFC → partner |
| Partner ack | API webhook | Real-time | Partner → NBFC |
| Daily MIS | SFTP CSV or API | Daily | NBFC → partner |
| Settlement instruction | Bank file | Daily / weekly | Sponsor bank instruction by NBFC |
| Reconciliation file | CSV | Daily | Sponsor bank |
| Borrower communication | n/a (NBFC owns) | as required | NBFC |
CLM-2 (assignment-based) — end-to-end flow
Section titled “CLM-2 (assignment-based) — end-to-end flow”1–5. Same as CLM-1, but in step 6:6. Booking: a) NBFC books 100% of the loan on its books. b) Within agreed window (T+1 to T+15), NBFC ASSIGNS partner's share. c) Assignment instrument signed. d) Partner pays for its share via NEFT/RTGS. ↓7. Disbursement: NBFC disburses from its own account (since 100% is booked by NBFC at this point). ↓8–13. Same as CLM-1.CLM-2 specific concerns
Section titled “CLM-2 specific concerns”- TLE-MD (Transfer of Loan Exposures Master Direction) alignment — the assignment must qualify as a true sale: substantial risk and reward transferred for the assigned share.
- Timing discipline — assignment must happen in the agreed window, consistently. Drift suggests re-characterisation risk.
- Accounting — on assignment, NBFC reverses partner’s share from its own books; recognises gain / loss per accounting policy.
Customer-facing differences
Section titled “Customer-facing differences”- Borrower sees single experience in both CLM-1 and CLM-2.
- KFS discloses both lenders in both.
- Sanction letter discloses both.
- Single point of contact for grievance is the originator (NBFC).
Operational differences
Section titled “Operational differences”| Dimension | CLM-1 | CLM-2 |
|---|---|---|
| Real-time partner integration | Required (or rapid batch) | Less critical (T+N) |
| Funding requirement at origination | Both lenders’ share required immediately | NBFC funds 100% until assignment |
| Cash position | Lower per loan | Higher per loan (working-capital intensive) |
| Risk of partner pull-back mid-process | Higher (each loan) | Lower (assignment can be skipped, NBFC keeps 100%) |
| Reg risk | Lower (cleaner structure) | Higher (assignment hygiene) |
Recommendation for first partner
Section titled “Recommendation for first partner”CLM-1. Cleanest regulatorily, cleanest operationally if partner has decent API maturity (a bank with API banking is sufficient). CLM-2 is a fallback when partner cannot move fast at origination.
Diagrammatic summary
Section titled “Diagrammatic summary” CO-LENT LOAN (CLM-1, 80:20 partner:NBFC)
┌───────────────────┐ │ Borrower │ └─────────┬─────────┘ │ (1) Apply / KYC / Sign ▼ ┌───────────────────┐ │ NBFC platform │ ────► (4) Booking instruction │ (originator, │ (5) Daily MIS │ single point │ (6) NPA / repayment updates │ of contact) │ ◄──── Ack / queries └─────┬──────┬──────┘ ▲ │ │ │ (2) NBFC's (3) Partner's [Partner Bank/NBFC] share funded share funded │ │ ▼ ▼ ┌───────────────────┐ │ CO-LENDING │ │ ESCROW │ │ (sponsor bank) │ └─────────┬─────────┘ │ Combined disbursement, single UTR ▼ [Borrower a/c]
Repayment flow: reverse — borrower → escrow → split → both lenders' a/cs.