12.3 Phase 3 — SaaS / LSP partner portal
Productise the platform far enough that a partner RE (bank or NBFC) can use it as their digital-lending stack — with the lender as the RE on books and the platform as the LSP earning fees.
Features
Section titled “Features”- Rich partner portal — origination MIS, policy configuration, branding tweaks, reporting, audit access.
- Tenant-aware data model (light multi-tenancy: tenant_id on every entity).
- Per-partner KFS / agreement templates.
- Per-partner policy + workflow configuration.
- Per-partner fee economics — origination, servicing, SaaS.
- Embedded SDK / iframe for partner UIs.
- DLG-as-LSP arrangement if applicable.
- API / SFTP both supported for daily MIS exchange.
Integrations
Section titled “Integrations”- Additional partner integrations.
- One or two embedded distribution partners (CA software, accounting cloud, marketplace).
- Add
2engineering for multi-tenancy. - Add
1 – 2customer success / partner success. - Add
1enterprise sales.
3 – 4 months.
Build vs buy
Section titled “Build vs buy”- Multi-tenancy framework: Build (start light; full tenant-isolation by Phase 7).
- Partner portal: Build (rich, role-based).
- SDK for embedded distribution: Build.
Acceptance criteria
Section titled “Acceptance criteria”- One LSP-style customer live (own NBFC’s book or second NBFC).
- Per-partner reporting works end-to-end.
- Multi-tenant data isolation tested.
- LSP fee flows confirmed in P&L.
- Customisation requests fragmenting the codebase.
- Multi-tenancy bugs leaking data across tenants (high-risk).
- Sales cycle long; expectations need management.
Go / no-go for Phase 4
Section titled “Go / no-go for Phase 4”- Stable phase 3 operations.
- Underwriting team ready to evaluate ML / advanced features.