Skip to content

17.6 Recovery analytics

Recovery without analytics is reactive — fire-fighting one NPA at a time. Recovery analytics turns the recovery function into a continuously improving operation.

This page is the metric inventory and the analytics framework.

The single most important recovery metric.

For each NPA cohort (loans turning NPA in a defined month), track cumulative recovery rate over time:

NPA cohort = loans newly classified NPA in month M
Day 0: 0% recovered
Day 30: X%
Day 60: Y%
...
Day 360: Z%
Day 720: W%

Each cohort produces a recovery curve. Curves compare across cohorts to see if recovery operation is improving.

Cumulative recovery rate %
100% ┤
90% ┤
80% ┤ ─── ← Cohort Jan 2024 (legacy approach)
70% ┤ ─────────
60% ┤ ────────────
50% ┤ ──────────── ─── ← Cohort Jan 2025 (improved)
40% ┤ ────────── ───────────────
30% ┤ ──── ────────────
20% ┤─── ──────────
10% ┤ ──────────
0% └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
0 90 180 270 360 450 540 630 720
Days since NPA classification

If Jan-2025 cohort outperforms Jan-2024 at the same age, your recovery operation has improved.

  • Cohort composition (segment / ticket / product).
  • Recovery effort allocated (number of agents, escalation paths).
  • Legal pipeline efficiency.
  • Settlement policy generosity.
  • Macroeconomic environment.
  • One curve per cohort month.
  • Aggregate “year-cohort” curves.
  • Per-segment cohort curves.
  • Per-ticket-band cohort curves.
  • Per-channel cohort curves.

Bucket-to-bucket transition rates per month.

From / ToStandardSMA-0SMA-1SMA-2NPA
Standard95.2%4.5%0.2%0.1%0.0%
SMA-075%10%12%2%1%
SMA-150%15%15%15%5%
SMA-225%15%15%25%20%
NPA5%2%3%5%85%

The matrix shows:

  • % curing from each delinquent bucket.
  • % rolling worse.
  • % staying stuck.

Deteriorating matrix month-over-month is an early warning.

Recovery cost / amount recovered
  • For SMA-0 / 1: very low (mostly automated reminders).
  • For SMA-2: medium (calls, visits).
  • For NPA: high (legal pipeline, agent intensity).
  • For settled / written-off: high.

Total cost / total recovered = blended recovery cost ratio. Industry typical: 5 – 15% of recovered amount.

If your ratio climbs without proportional recovery improvement, the recovery function is becoming inefficient.

Per agent / agency metrics:

  • Cases assigned.
  • Cases resolved (cure / settled / closed).
  • Resolution rate = resolved / assigned.
  • Average resolution time.
  • Recovery ₹ per ₹ of cost.
  • Compliance flags (call sampling QA breaches).
  • Complaint count.

Per agent, distribution of call dispositions:

  • PTP count.
  • RNR (Refused / No Response).
  • Wrong number.
  • Busy.
  • Refused.

Outlier agents (very high RNR rate vs peers) flagged for QA + training.

For settled loans, track:

  • Average haircut % by bucket age.
  • Settlement-to-original-outstanding distribution.
  • Time from NPA to settlement.
  • Borrower segment / ticket / channel drivers.

Insights:

  • Are we over-settling (giving away too much)?
  • Are we under-settling (chasing for years instead of closing)?
  • Which borrower segments respond best to settlement offers?

For each legal case (arbitration / civil / DRT / SARFAESI):

  • Case opened date.
  • Path chosen.
  • Cost incurred (legal fees, court costs).
  • Outcome (judgment / settlement during proceedings / pending / dismissed).
  • Recovery from outcome.
  • Net = recovery - cost.

Per legal path, compute:

  • Median time to resolution.
  • Median recovery rate.
  • Median net (recovery - cost).

This informs path-selection policy.

For loans written off:

  • Pre-write-off characteristics — what made them un-recoverable?
  • Post-write-off recovery — sometimes substantial (cash-basis recognition).
  • Lifetime recovery (pre + post write-off) per cohort.

Pattern recognition:

  • Specific segments / channels with high write-off rates → underwriting feedback.
  • Specific recovery actions that improved post-write-off recovery → operational learning.

For loans that turned NPA, retrospective:

  • Was an EWS raised before NPA?
  • Was the EWS triaged appropriately?
  • Could earlier action have prevented NPA?

EWS effectiveness rate = % of NPAs that had a triggered EWS before classification. Higher is better; below 50% suggests EWS engine is weak.

ProductAvg recovery rateAvg time to recoveryRecovery cost ratio
Revolving WC line
Term loan
Invoice-backed
Anchor-led SCF
Co-lent

Cross-product comparison guides product mix and pricing decisions.

ChannelNPA rateRecovery rateNet contribution
Direct
DSA
CA
Anchor

Channels with high NPA + low recovery are net-negative; consider reducing allocation.

For loans disbursed X months ago, current default status:

  • 0 – 6 months post-disbursement: typical “honeymoon” default rate.
  • 6 – 12 months: stabilising.
  • 12 – 24 months: full picture.

Cohort comparison shows whether underwriting has improved over time.

Periodic stress tests:

  • “If credit cost doubles, what’s the impact on AUM, CRAR, P&L?”
  • “If 10% of book moves to SMA-2 next quarter, what’s recovery capacity?”
  • “If a major anchor exits, what’s the contagion?”

Drives capital planning and recovery-team sizing.

  • Cohort-tracking ETL — every NPA loan tagged to its cohort month.
  • Recovery-rate computation updated daily.
  • Roll-rate matrix generated monthly.
  • Per-agent / agency dashboards.
  • Settlement / restructure / legal pipeline analytics.
  • EWS effectiveness retrospective.
  • Reporting cadence — daily dashboards for operations, weekly for risk team, monthly for CRO + board.
  • Daily: ops dashboard view.
  • Weekly: recovery team review meeting.
  • Monthly: CRO + recovery head review with action plan.
  • Quarterly: board risk committee review.

For the board’s risk committee:

  • Cumulative NPA % of AUM.
  • Recovery rate on NPA pool YTD.
  • Provisioning vs realised loss.
  • Cohort-curve trends.
  • Recovery cost ratio.
  • Settlement / restructure / legal pipeline summary.
  • Write-off pattern.
  • EWS effectiveness.

These metrics, tracked over time, give the board the picture of how recovery is performing.

Mature recovery operation shows:

  • Cohort recovery curves steepening over time (newer cohorts recover faster).
  • Roll-rate matrix improving (fewer roll-forward, more cure).
  • Recovery cost ratio stable or declining.
  • Settlement / restructure / legal mix balanced (no over-reliance on any one tool).
  • EWS effectiveness rising.
  • Write-off rate predictable and declining.
  • DPDP — analytics on borrower data must respect purpose limitation.
  • Board governance — recovery analytics is a board-reportable area.
  • Internal audit — periodic audit of recovery analytics methodology.